Australasian Housing Institute, AHI

A (not so) radical approach to tackling homelessness

Liam Turner from  CIH in the UK talks with  Greater Change co-founder and CEO  Jonathan Tan about why their unusual model of giving cash grants to people facing homelessness not only makes sense but is also highly effective.

£250 to help a man who used to sleep on the streets buy essential furnishings for his new home. £1,040 to help a formerly homeless woman pay a deposit on a flat as she starts her new job. £500 to help a newly unemployed man clear his arrears so he can focus on his studies and getting back into employment. 

 

These are the stories of people who have been helped by Greater Change, an Oxford-based social enterprise working with charitable partners across England to provide tailored financial support to people at risk of homelessness. It was set up by co-founders Alex McCallion and Jonathan Tan following a pilot incubated by Oxford University in 2018, and has to date supported more than 1,300 people with an average of £1,319 each.

 

The model is radically simple–and unusually unique. Here’s how it works. 

 

Once a client, typically one living in temporary accommodation, approaches one of Greater Change’s partner charities, a support worker makes an assessment and writes a referral to Greater Change outlining the support they need. Once accepted, Greater Change launches a bespoke campaign on its website to raise the funding needed (unless the client can’t be identified due to safety reasons, in which case the funding is raised in other ways). This money is then sent to the support worker, who buys the items for the client or makes the arrangements for things like rent deposits.

Greater Change

"Instead of having a difficult-to-implement foreign aid programme, you can simply give people cash."

The system has been extraordinarily successful, as CEO and co-founder Jonathan Tan attests. "It [is] really effective...because instead of having a difficult-to-implement foreign aid programme, you can simply give people cash,” he explains. “And actually, that's way cheaper to do.”

 

But it’s not enough to just give people money and point to how many have been supported. You also need to show that the model is working, that those receiving support are able to sustain tenancies, jobs, and ultimately live healthy, productive lives outside the shadow of homelessness. 

 

Greater Change’s latest impact report shows it has been able to do that. In 2023, 86 per cent of Greater Change clients have been housed in permanent or sustained stable accommodation, with nearly 50 % securing gainful employment. What’s more, the report states that an average of £35,177 in cost-savings have been made per person, saving a total of £47.3 million for local and central governments. 

 

The model is clearly effective. So why isn’t it more widespread?

Not so radical? 

 

Although the Greater Change model of personalised budgets isn’t new, especially in the international development space, it’s still something of a novelty in the UK. There have been trials, such as in Devon in 2005 and in the City of London in 2012, which produced some promising results, but none have ever developed into anything more substantial. 

 

The result of these small, start-stop studies and trials, Jonathan says, is that the model is “unfortunately still quite radical”. 

 

“It's been tried on a very small scale prior to us,” he explains. “We kind of took that and decided to run with it. So, there is certainly this whole standing-on-the-shoulders-of-giants thing... but doing it at the scale that we're at, where we’re supporting thousands of people, that's quite new.” 

"You don't see people making their addictions worse when they receive cash transfers."

Part of it is down to the perception that homeless people aren’t good with budgeting their money, or that they’ll will blow any money given to them on temptation goods such as booze and drugs. However, there’s a growing body of evidence that shows that’s not necessarily the case. 

 

“I believe quite strongly in the evidence that that doesn't happen,” Jonathan says. “You don't see people making their addictions worse when they receive cash transfers.” 

 

He adds: “Giving people agency and choice — that's a good thing. But if you look at how a lot of the systems are designed, they don't give people agency and choice, and there's very little trust in general.”

To be clear, the Greater Change model doesn’t involve giving direct cash transfers to clients. Instead, the support worker is responsible for allocating the money that’s been raised. 

 

However, Jonathan says this isn’t because of a lack of trust. Rather, it’s because of a fear that it might affect their benefits. He explains that dropping a large sum of money into their bank account might trigger sanctions on their benefits, an outcome that would set them back on their efforts to escape the threat of homelessness. 

 

“The important thing is that people still get the dignity of choice,” Jonathan says. “They still get to choose what they want to spend the money on. But in terms of financial admin, it doesn't flow directly through them. At least not most of the time.”

Scaling up 

 

Greater Change’s success can be partly put down to how it has been able to forge partnerships and to get people on board with its approach. Its list of partners is vast and ever-growing and includes housing associations such as Peabody, local authorities such as Oxford City Council, and homelessness charities such as Shelter. 

 

But what Jonathan and the rest of the Greater Change team want to do now is to grow and connect with even more partners. Not just in the south-east, where it has built up the majority of its partnerships so far, but in all areas of England and the UK. 

 

“We have philanthropic funding that we need to deploy right now,” Jonathan explains. “Our doors are open, and we're always very happy to speak to anyone. We don't have any particular geographic restriction.” 

 

“We're just trying to talk to as many people as we can,” he adds. “Which is a very fortunate position to be in.” 

 

Jonathan explains that Greater Change is able to fully match any funding a local authority partner puts into launching a personalised budgets programme in their local area. “So, if they put £50,000 into the programme or £100,000, we would match that with our philanthropic funding.” 

 

By connecting with more housing associations (which can act as referral partners, for example), local authorities, charities and other organisations, and by generating more funding, Greater Change hopes to have supported 40,000 people by 2033. Will it succeed? 

"We are not here to just help as many people as we can. We definitely want to do that, but we know that the real goal here is policy change."

“It depends a lot on how successful we are in our fundraising and how we work when developing new local authority partnerships in the coming years as well,” Jonathan says. “I'm hopeful that we will go well beyond that in the next 10 years.” 

 

However, the end goal of Greater Change is not to provide financial support to as many people as possible. While that might be the current focus, in the long term, Jonathan and co-founder Alex McCallion hope to help effect a change in homelessness policy that will see the end of homelessness in the UK for good. 

 

And it’s hard to argue, especially as the numbers of people facing hardship and homelessness continue to rise. In England alone, the latest official statistics shows that more than 350,000 households contacted their local authority for support after being threatened with homelessness or losing their home in 2023/24 — more than 320,000 of which were assessed as being homeless. 

 

There are also more than 120,000 households currently living in temporary accommodation, with the number of children living in temporary accommodation approaching 160,000. The cost to councils is more than £2.2 billion a year.

 

“We are not here to just help as many people as we can,” Jonathan explains. “We definitely want to do that, but we know that the real goal here is policy change."

The mission at hand

 

Until then, Jonathan and the growing Greater Change team are committed to working resolutely to support those at risk of homelessness and in need of financial support. 

 

People like prison-leaver Kealan, who needs £1,350 to cover the deposit and first month’s rent of his new accommodation. People like former rough-sleeper Adam, who needs £480 to buy essential furnishings for his new accommodation. And people like new mother Sanaa, who at the time of writing is just six per cent away from her goal of raising £1,260 to buy essentials for her new flat. 

 

It is their struggle that Greater Change strives to remedy, one donation at a time.

How the Greater Change model works 

  1. Partner charities refer an individual in need of support to Greater Change 
  2. Greater Change works with the partner to agree on the support the individual needs and how that support will be funded 
  3. The funding target is reached, and the monies are released to the charity partner, who then allocates the funding 
  4. Greater Change measures the impact six to 12 months on.
Advertisement

Share This Article

Other articles you may like

Harry Smith, new Australasian Housing Institute CEO
April 2, 2025
Harry Smith has recently commenced his role at the ahi as CEO after 26 years in the social services and government sectors across a range of diverse responsibilities. Harry brings a wealth of sector-specific knowledge and experience, supporting our members and our wider community.
February 14, 2025
It is with great pleasure that we announce nominations are now open for the ahi: 2025 Brighter Future Awards .
February 14, 2025
About the Australasian Housing Institute The Australasian Housing Institute (ahi) is a professional body for workers in the social and affordable housing and Specialist Homelessness Service (SHS) sectors across Australia and New Zealand. It has Branch Committees in each state and territory, as well as in New Zealand. The ahi is submitting a response to the Draft NSW Homelessness Strategy (the Strategy), representing the collective feedback of the NSW Branch Committee, with the support of the entire ahi organization. With over 2,000 members across NSW, ahi members work in both government and non-government housing organizations. The ahi has a long history of collaborating with SHS, Specialist Disability Services, and other mainstream services, including health, education, and local councils. For the past 25 years, ahi has been proudly delivering training for industry housing professionals across a wide range of areas, including tenancy management, asset management, and governance. The ahi also hosts masterclasses and networking events to support its members. The ahi provides professional development to the workforce through: Training and knowledge-building on a range of issues relevant to social housing professionals, from induction programs for new workers to advanced and specialized training in areas such as asset management, trauma-informed approaches with applicants and tenants, personal development, and community participation. A mentoring program that pairs experienced professionals with newer or younger members to help them achieve their career aspirations and goals. A certification program for social housing professionals to uphold professional standards and ensure success in their area of expertise. Leading the Annual Brighter Future Awards, which recognize excellence in the social housing industry. Promoting active, engaged, and connected membership through the delivery of topical events, seminars, webinars, masterclasses, and more. As a member-based professional body, the ahi is uniquely positioned to build trust, enhance skills, and foster relationships across both the government and non-government sectors, as well as between organizations. Summary The ahi congratulates the NSW Government on its significant investment of $6.6 billion in the 2024 budget, aimed at tackling the unprecedented housing stress and the rising numbers of individuals experiencing homelessness driven by the ongoing rental crisis in both the private rental and social housing sectors. The Strategy for 2025-2035 is highly commendable, with its three core goals—rare, brief, and non-repeated—standing out as ambitious and impactful objectives aimed at addressing homelessness. These goals are set to bring about significant changes in the social housing system and provide a clear policy framework to guide efforts toward achieving meaningful outcomes over the next decade. The ahi recognizes the importance of this Strategy and the critical role that the social and affordable rental housing system plays in meeting these goals, emphasizing the need for genuine, whole-of-government collaboration in delivering results. This approach involves collaboration across government, the not-for-profit community housing sector, and mainstream services, all supported by SHS’s within a Housing First framework and guided by a clear governance structure. It marks a shift from a deficit-driven perspective to a solution-focused, positive approach. The success of this transformation relies on collective efforts through co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery, ensuring the long-term effectiveness of the change. For this paradigm shift to succeed, it will require a skilled, committed, and dedicated workforce, as outlined in Principle 8 (The Workforce is Strong and Capable). Recognizing the need for a sustained, locally connected workforce is crucial to addressing the diverse needs of individuals experiencing homelessness across all three phases of their journey. In its feedback on the Strategy, the ahi emphasizes the importance of focused attention on homelessness and social housing workforce planning, professional development, industry support, and the need for culturally competent workers—both paid and voluntary—who bring diversity, inclusion skills, and lived experience. Finally, the ahi urges that Principle 8, which highlights the strength and capability of the workforce, be prioritized, particularly in supporting First Nations people experiencing housing stress and homelessness, with a long-term vision extending beyond the next 10 years. Detailed response The following is more a detailed response from the ahi to the questions outlined in the consultation paper for the Strategy. SECTION 1: The Guiding Principles of the Strategy 1. What do we need to consider as we implement services and system reform guided by these principles (total 9) over the next 10 years? As we implement services and system reform guided by these principles over the next 10 years, the ahi suggests the following approaches be prioritized: Workforce planning should be a key focus in the first rolling action plan (2025-2027), with an emphasis on forecasting the ongoing skills and competency needs throughout the life of The Strategy. This will ensure the workforce is equipped to meet evolving demands. Increasing the supply of dwellings to address crisis, transition, and permanent housing needs must be matched by a parallel increase in the workforce. This includes expanding both paid employees and volunteers within social housing, community housing organizations, and Specialist Homelessness Services (SHS). A well-supported workforce is essential to ensuring the successful and sustainable delivery of outcomes envisioned by the Strategy. Skilling workers who assist First Nations people experiencing homelessness should be prioritised. This requires a culturally competent workforce at all levels to provide high-quality services and ensure that First Nations people do not experience repeated homelessness. By focusing on cultural competence, we can foster better outcomes and long-term stability for these communities. 2. Which Principle should be prioritized and why? The ahi fully supports all nine Principles, with particular emphasis on Principle 8: Workforce is Strong and Capable, as being foundational. Addressing homelessness is a person-centered solution that requires culturally competent employees and volunteers who can establish strong, supportive networks with wraparound services at the local community level. This is essential to meeting the evolving needs and remains a high priority in the First Action Plan (2025-2027). Ongoing professional development for workers is crucial to ensuring long-term success in meeting the changing social, economic, and environmental needs of those living in quality housing. It is also vital for ensuring tenants not only live well but stay connected to their communities. Supporting the workforce’s safety and wellness is key to maintaining a capable, resilient workforce, which in turn ensures the best possible quality of housing, management, and support for tenants. SECTION 2: Strategy focus areas: 1. To make homelessness rare, what should NSW prioritise for action and why? The ahi believes that adequate funding for SHS’s is essential to ensure they are properly resourced to assist individuals at risk of or in a crisis state of homelessness at the point of need. The ability to identify risks and allocate resources effectively for intake assessments and service coordination is key to early intervention and prevention. A triage system is vital for facilitating positive outcomes, aiming to make homelessness a one-off experience. The ahi also supports dedicated funding for staff training and development in this field, recognizing its importance in preventing homelessness from becoming a long-term issue. Investing in training allows for timely and appropriate interventions, helping to break the cycle of homelessness early on. 2. What opportunities and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? Delaying action in assisting individuals experiencing homelessness can lead to a loss of faith and hope in the NSW housing system, pushing them toward the justice system or, in the case of older people or women escaping domestic violence, even premature death. Implementing this outcome presents an opportunity to build a culturally competent, and trauma-informed workforce, a key factor to transforming lives while simultaneously increasing the supply of housing. Supporting a resilient workforce, where high job satisfaction is fostered, creates committed and effective workers who can make a lasting difference. 3. What types (s) would be most useful to measure our impact and why? A key target in the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is to reduce the number of people on the social housing waitlist during the reporting period. This measure will serve as an indicator of success and validate the effectiveness of early intervention policies in preventing homelessness. Additionally, setting targets for the number of employees and volunteers in the social housing and SHS sectors, as well as tracking turnover rates, is essential to assessing the success of building a stronger, more capable workforce. 4. To make homelessness brief, what should NSW Priorities for action & why? Domestic violence, family abuse, and coercive control are major causes of homelessness among women, with the number of homeless women and children increasing according to the latest data. Adequate funding for this vulnerable group is a top priority. Supporting these women has a profound impact on their recovery, resilience, and ability to raise their children, leading to positive generational outcomes in the long term. The rising trend of older women experiencing homelessness for the first time also requires early intervention to prevent premature death. 5. What opportunity and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? The continued trend of women dying as a result of domestic violence and family abuse is deeply concerning. In 2024, 14 older women aged 55 and over were killed, a distressing statistic according to the Commissioner for Domestic and Family Violence, Michaela Cronin. These women are at a higher risk of vulnerability, often with no support systems to rely on. Implementing actions under this outcome presents a crucial opportunity to save lives, reduce the number of women experiencing both domestic violence and homelessness, and help them rebuild their lives. 6. What types of target(s) would be useful for measuring our impact and why? Reducing the number of women who die as a result of domestic violence and family abuse during the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is an important metric to track and report, demonstrating the efficacy of The Strategy. Individual success stories are powerful testimonies that show the goals of the Strategy are benefiting both individuals and the housing system. The skills required for employees and volunteers in this area demand dedicated funding and training resources. Implementing a measure to evaluate the outcomes of training courses would be valuable, helping to refine and improve the content and application of these programs. 7. To ensure homelessness is not repeated, what should NSW prioritize for action and why? First Nations people are overrepresented in experiencing homelessness and face significant challenges in breaking the cycle. Priority should be given to this group under the Housing First Principle, supported by skilled and capable staff and volunteers, to empower them and prevent repeat homelessness. Rental tenancy laws in NSW should be reviewed, particularly regarding the cessation of tenancy due to prolonged absences. Cultural customs related to death and bereavement (Sorry Business) should be recognised as acceptable reasons for absences and incorporated into tenancy policies. 8. What opportunities and risks are there in implementing actions under this outcome? The risk of not achieving the goals outlined in the National Agreement on Closing the Gap for the NSW Government is significant if priority is not given to properly housing and supporting First Nations people. There are valuable opportunities in collaborating with Aboriginal leaders through a co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery approach. Their collective commitment to improving the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people can lead to positive outcomes in housing, health, education, employment, justice, safety, and inclusion. 9. What types of target(s) would be most useful to measure the impact and why? Increase the number of Aboriginal workers with certified qualifications across various areas of the Aboriginal housing sector. Aboriginal tenants depend on highly qualified and culturally competent workers and volunteers to help build their resilience and prevent repeated homelessness. Regular customer satisfaction surveys should be conducted to measure tenants’ satisfaction levels and identify areas of strength and improvement. Conclusion The ahi supports an ambitious supply growth program throughout the life of the Strategy to address homelessness in NSW. With 63,260 households (based on 2023-2024 data) currently on the waiting list, it is crucial to reduce this number over the next 10 years through the rolling action plans. Successfully delivering the Strategy will require a skilled, trauma-informed, and competent workforce to implement an integrated housing system. While workforce planning is mentioned as one of the nine principles, its lack of detailed planning is concerning. The ahi strongly suggests that the principles of co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery be incorporated from the outset in developing the rolling action plans. The ahi thanks the NSW Government for the opportunity to submit feedback and for its ongoing consideration of building a strong and capable workforce that is recognised and supported by a broad range of industries. The value of including people with lived experience and their unique knowledge and skills cannot be overlooked as an essential voice in this transformative process. Contact NSW Branch Committee - Australasian Housing Institute admin@housinginstitute.org www.theahi.com.au (02) 6494 7566 Date submitted: 11/2/25 Submitted to: Homelessness.strategy@homes.nsw.gov.au
More Articles
Share by: