Australasian Housing Institute, AHI

Co-ops can and should be a serious part of Australia’s housing solution

Australasian social and affordable housing consultant Donald Proctor went on a study tour of European housing co-ops earlier in 2024, and we're now privileged to share in his discoveries.

Housing co-operatives currently make up less than 0.1% of Australia’s housing. This compares to about 20% in parts of Europe.



Having just been part of the European co-op study tour group organised by the Business Council for Co-operatives and Mutuals (BCCM), I am even more convinced we should and can facilitate the growth of affordable rental housing co-ops in Australia. Let me explain why it should and how it could happen.

I used to be a co-op warrior


While a student in the 1980s, I became involved in setting up STUCCO (Sydney University Housing Co-op) in Newtown, which is still going strong today as affordable, self-managed housing for low-income students. This led me to involvement with other co-ops getting off the ground with grant assistance from the Federal Government’s Local Government and Community Housing Program (LGCHP) and me joining the board of the Association to Resource Co-op Housing (ARCH) that morphed into Common Equity NSW (CENSW). 


Out of the LGCHP in the 1980s and '90s, approximately 160 co-ops were established across Australia, comprising about 2,750 households (Australia’s housing co-operative sector, BCCM June 2024).


For a career, I went mainstream; to work for the NSW Department of Housing (now Homes NSW) and later a couple of Community Housing Providers (CHPs). From this vantage point, I was always disappointed to see support for new co-ops dwindle, and not just in NSW but right across Australia. 


Over the next decades, public housing funding was effectively strangled, community housing grew through transfers from public housing, and Commonwealth funding increasingly chased votes through subsidies to homeownership and private market rental. Co-op funding was essentially cut off, except to fund common equity umbrella groups to ensure existing co-op compliance.


Suddenly, we have a housing crisis!


As Australia’s housing affordability crisis has risen to unacceptable levels (defined by some cynics as now affecting a critical mass of middleclass voters), some housing reforms have been realised with the establishment of NHFIC, Housing Australia and the multi-billion dollar Housing Australia Future Fund, as well as long-awaited state funding boosts such as the Big Housing Build in Victoria, the Queensland Investment Corporation funding, and recent announcements in NSW regarding public housing funding and planning reforms.


Understandably, the first round of Housing Australia funds will be directed to social and affordable housing projects driven by State Housing Authorities (SHAs) and Tier 1 CHPs. It is these bodies that have built the expertise and infrastructure to form consortia, apply for funding and manage large projects. 


My view is that co-ops should be supported by the next rounds of funding as a strategic part of Australia’s future housing mix. 


Why co-ops should be part of the solution


The BCCM study tour group visited many housing co-ops in Copenhagen, Vienna and Zurich. We also met with government representatives, co-op sector resource groups and banks specialising in co-op financing. 


By all measures, the co-ops were fantastic and inspiring, garnering broad support in their countries, community and on all sides of politics, except maybe a few far-right wreckers. We witnessed affordable housing systems for grown-ups, sustainable and free of political wedging, with tangible levels of co-operation between tiers of government, financiers, the non-government sector and consumers. We met tenants living inclusively in great housing where they felt safe, secure, empowered and engaged in their communities.


While the co-ops and the national housing systems varied, we noted common themes that met the description of a typical co-op (see below):


A typical European housing co-op

A typical European housing co-op
Size The typical European housing co-op may have grown from a group of, say, 10 households into an organisation that houses 1000s of households in many locations (estates) within the city.
Form The co-op has predominantly multi-storey apartment blocks with a mix of smaller and larger apartments to cater for the desired household mix. Townhouses and low-rise flats are also common. Estates have excellent shared common facilities such as kitchen and dining areas, gardens, laundries, meeting and working rooms, libraries, bicycle and equipment storage. Car parking is minimised. A high quality of design and construction is achieved because the co-op was born out of an independently judged competition for the site and a design brief for long-term amenity, low maintenance and environmental sustainability. Apartments are typically modest in size, driven by funding guidelines and the need to keep rents low.
Eligibility A co-op member cannot generally own another home, but there is usually no income test. A new member must sign up to the co-op rules, which include a commitment to participate in the management or maintenance. A member must fully occupy their apartment. For example, if children move out, they agree to move to a smaller apartment to allow for a larger family to move in.
Rent and member contribution New members are required to pay a membership contribution, which is refundable (with CPI) upon leaving. Rents are charged on a cost rent basis at a rate based on floor area of each apartment. Everyone pays a similar rent per square metre. An established co-op has a lower cost rent due to more sunk costs over time. Low-income members who cannot afford the cost rent can generally obtain income support from government (similar to CRA). Also, for temporary hardship, the co-op assists members using its 'solidarity fund', which accumulates from part of rental income. Members also contribute their time each week to a duty or project agreed by the co-op.
Governance Resident members are elected to the local estate management committee, and then they may represent their estate at the co-op board. The larger co-op board will employ professionals to manage day to day matters. The co-op may also vote a member to represent the co-op on the board of a sector-wide resourcing organisation (e.g. common equity organisation). Boards are generally co-op members only.
Financing The established co-op is self-financing, but they would have received an establishment loan in the past, which has since been repaid. The co-op won a competition for land made available by the city government, which has a significant land bank for this purpose (e.g. a Landcom or Vic Urban). Winning the competition gave the co-op the right to lease the land from the city for an initial period of 65 years with option to renew if still a viable co-op. The co-op development was funded initially by a government co-op revolving loan scheme, mixed with a government guaranteed commercial loan from a mutual bank and member contributions. After the commercial loan was repaid, the co-op consequently repaid the government loan, making those funds available again for future co-ops. As the loans were repaid, operating costs fell. However, as the co-op has aged, the cost of capital improvements has risen.
Social mix Co-op households have a mixed-income profile that supports financial sustainability and social diversity. While the majority of co-op members have low-to-moderate incomes, the co-op does not need to monitor them, nor adjust rents in response to changing incomes.
Relationship to other tenures Cost rents in the co-op will generally be around 20% lower than private market rents in the neighbourhood but are not affected by market spikes in either rents or property prices. Co-op living is not exceptional – perhaps 20% of people in the city live in one. This compares with about 20% living in city-managed housing, 20% in market rental and 40% who are homeowners. The cost of homeownership in the city is generally very high, but co-op members feel safe and secure, which means that they don't have any ambitions to achieve homeownership or to escape the high and volatile cost and insecurity of market rental.

Key takeaways and application to Australia


While the detail of our tour is being documented in the group’s upcoming report, my take on why existing and new co-ops should be supported to become a significant part of Australia’s housing spectrum is as follows:

My takeaways Application to Australia
1. European housing co-ops exist at scale as a mainstream housing option. This provides a safe, secure and affordable long-term housing solution for low- and middle-income households that can have a substantial impact on improving the wellbeing of individuals and families. This is the foundation for the world’s most liveable cities. Australian governments should foster the significant development of mixed low- and middle-income housing co-operatives that provide a better option for social and private market renters, whether they aspire to homeownership in the future or not.
2. Governments, the people and banks love co-ops because they meet housing need, are reliable and self-reliant, and they become more commercially successful over the long-term. Commonwealth and state/territory governments, Housing Australia, mutual banks and superannuation funds can collaborate to produce efficient co-op financing schemes that reduce risk and minimise interest costs.
3. Financing co-ops need not be a drain on governments when adopting government-guaranteed revolving loan schemes in partnership with private sector financial institutions and member contributions. Revolving government loan schemes in Australia, modelled on those in Denmark and Switzerland, can build to perpetual financing schemes over time. Cost rent, mixed-income profiles and member contributions can achieve long-term financial viability and independence in affordable housing.
4. Competitive tender processes can ensure the best co-ops – with the best concepts, budgets and management – prosper and grow. Housing Australia and common equity organisations are well-established to manage competitive processes where co-ops have at least equal opportunity to CHPs to obtain financial assistance for projects.
5. National and city (state) governments can co-operate to foster a housing co-op sector that requires minimal ongoing support and regulation but builds a housing portfolio for benefit of current and future co-op members, and the broader community over time. Co-ops already exist successfully in Australia, but successive governments have not designed policy that supports their growth. Policy has favoured CHP mainstream social housing over expansion of more self-reliant, affordable rental co-ops. This missed opportunity should be redressed.
6. 'Tenant democracy' is a fundamental, universal characteristic of all co-op sectors. Tenant/member participation in Australian rental housing can and should be valued and practised much more. European models show this can be done for great benefit.
7. European and Australian housing and financial systems are not fundamentally different, so adopting the best aspects of European co-ops for Australia is quite feasible. Housing Australia now has the infrastructure and funding to lead reforms subject to government direction. Australia’s private lending institutions (bank and non-bank) and private investors will be lining up to invest in co-ops under the right system settings.

Who else is pitching for co-ops?


Since dipping my toes into co-ops again after a long absence, I have discovered a world of great people working to get co-ops back on the agenda in Australia:



  • Common Equity NSW, Common Equity Housing Ltd (Victoria), Common Equity Housing SA and Co-operation Housing WA have been working tirelessly over many years to support the existing co-ops to demonstrate how good they can be.


  • BCCM has adopted housing co-ops as a key part of its stable of co-ops and mutual organisations, and provides secretariat support to the Australian Co-operative Housing Alliance (ACHA), which is made up of BCCM member housing co-operatives. 

 

  • Through their Bunya Fund, BCCM has supported a number of organisations to pursue innovative co-operative housing models, such as Co-operation Housing and the Kyloring Co-Operative, Middle Ground and scalable models of secure tenure housing without ongoing subsidy, and the Community Land Trust co-op model.


  • The Australian Co-operative Housing Alliance has been established to advocate for the benefits of the housing co-operative model, and the growth and diversification of the social housing sector in Australia.


  • New research led by Professor Louise Crabtree-Hayes has shown the benefits of co-ops can be profound with the aspects of co-operation and participation providing a strong sense of community directly connected to positive employment, health and educational outcomes at no extra cost to the community.


  • Local Government Information Unit Australia is briefing local governments about housing co-ops and how they can help promote them.

Copenhagen Rental Housing Co-operative Federation HQ

Copenhagen Rental Housing Co-operative Federation HQ

Copenhagen Frederiksberg Co-op for students and refugees.  Modular construction built off site, craned into position

Copenhagen. Co-op in “Rock & Roll” precinct.  Seniors top levels, families in the middle, students on the ground floor. 

Copenhagen. Co-op in “Rock & Roll” precinct.  Seniors top levels, families in the middle, students on the ground floor. 

Copenhagen. Co-op in “Rock & Roll” precinct.  Seniors top levels, families in the middle, students on the ground floor.

Vienna. Wohn-Project Wien

Vienna. Co-ops from 1920s and 2020s

Vienna. Co-ops from 1920s and 2020s

Vienna. Co-ops from 1920s and 2020s

Zurich. Affordable housing for families featuring double height apartments. Large complex includes badminton courts and rock climbing open to public.

What next?


BCCM has done the groundwork – well before the tour – raising interest from housing ministers and heads of housing departments around the country. We’re now about to deliver a report to these decision-makers with recommendations to apply the benefits of European housing co-ops to the Australian housing system at scale.


BCCM’s mutual bank members are developing co-op investment funds where private investors can invest in co-op funds like property trusts, rather than directly in the private rental property market with its high entry and exit costs, managing risks, agents' fees, administration and pesky tenants.   


What can ahi: members do to support the growth of co-ops?


I would suggest the first step is to open your minds to questioning some of the shibboleths of our social and affordable housing system, like:


"Tenant democracy is too hard"
(even though its proven not to be)


"The scarce housing dollar should be protected for only the poorest"
(even though this stunts viability and causes concentrations of social disadvantage, and ends up wasting larger development sites by selling part off to private buyers)


"Social housing rents should be based purely on a percentage of household income"
(which requires massive rent review admin, incentivises tenants not to increase their incomes, and limits the overall housing supply for people on the waiting list)


"Charities can’t do cost rent"
(then change the rules, if this is a problem)


"Co-ops are too hard for state housing authorities to deal with"
(whose problem is that, really?)


Then, maybe, through your organisations and the peaks, you could get on board with advocating to government policy makers for co-ops as a complementary model alongside other CHPs and public housing ­– just like it used to be in the 1980s.


If you work in a CHP, it's time to think about how you could partner with the co-operative housing sector to provide support and expertise to local groups in establishing co-ops. It could be lifechanging – in fact, that's highly likely. 


The views in this article are those of Donald Proctor and should not be construed as the views of the tour group organisers or members. 


Acknowledgement of 2024 BCCM European Co-op Tour participants:

  • Liz Thomas, CEO, Common Equity Ltd (Victoria), Melbourne, Victoria
  • Neil Wilmett, CEO, Queensland Aboriginal Housing Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland
  • Donald Proctor, Housing Co-operative Expert, Founder of STUCCO, Student Co-operative in Sydney, NSW
  • Emily Taylor, Associate, Core Collective Architects, Hobart, Tasmania
  • Craig Brooke, CEO KeyInvest, Adelaide, South Australia
  • Mark Smyth, CEO Beyond Bank, Coffs Harbour, NSW
  • Melina Morrison, CEO Business Council of Co-operatives and Mutuals, Sydney, NSW
  • Dr Sidsel Grimstad, Griffith Centre for Systems Innovation
  • Beverly Wood, Tours Logistics Officer, BCCM
Advertisement

Share This Article

Other articles you may like

Harry Smith, new Australasian Housing Institute CEO
April 2, 2025
Harry Smith has recently commenced his role at the ahi as CEO after 26 years in the social services and government sectors across a range of diverse responsibilities. Harry brings a wealth of sector-specific knowledge and experience, supporting our members and our wider community.
February 14, 2025
It is with great pleasure that we announce nominations are now open for the ahi: 2025 Brighter Future Awards .
February 14, 2025
About the Australasian Housing Institute The Australasian Housing Institute (ahi) is a professional body for workers in the social and affordable housing and Specialist Homelessness Service (SHS) sectors across Australia and New Zealand. It has Branch Committees in each state and territory, as well as in New Zealand. The ahi is submitting a response to the Draft NSW Homelessness Strategy (the Strategy), representing the collective feedback of the NSW Branch Committee, with the support of the entire ahi organization. With over 2,000 members across NSW, ahi members work in both government and non-government housing organizations. The ahi has a long history of collaborating with SHS, Specialist Disability Services, and other mainstream services, including health, education, and local councils. For the past 25 years, ahi has been proudly delivering training for industry housing professionals across a wide range of areas, including tenancy management, asset management, and governance. The ahi also hosts masterclasses and networking events to support its members. The ahi provides professional development to the workforce through: Training and knowledge-building on a range of issues relevant to social housing professionals, from induction programs for new workers to advanced and specialized training in areas such as asset management, trauma-informed approaches with applicants and tenants, personal development, and community participation. A mentoring program that pairs experienced professionals with newer or younger members to help them achieve their career aspirations and goals. A certification program for social housing professionals to uphold professional standards and ensure success in their area of expertise. Leading the Annual Brighter Future Awards, which recognize excellence in the social housing industry. Promoting active, engaged, and connected membership through the delivery of topical events, seminars, webinars, masterclasses, and more. As a member-based professional body, the ahi is uniquely positioned to build trust, enhance skills, and foster relationships across both the government and non-government sectors, as well as between organizations. Summary The ahi congratulates the NSW Government on its significant investment of $6.6 billion in the 2024 budget, aimed at tackling the unprecedented housing stress and the rising numbers of individuals experiencing homelessness driven by the ongoing rental crisis in both the private rental and social housing sectors. The Strategy for 2025-2035 is highly commendable, with its three core goals—rare, brief, and non-repeated—standing out as ambitious and impactful objectives aimed at addressing homelessness. These goals are set to bring about significant changes in the social housing system and provide a clear policy framework to guide efforts toward achieving meaningful outcomes over the next decade. The ahi recognizes the importance of this Strategy and the critical role that the social and affordable rental housing system plays in meeting these goals, emphasizing the need for genuine, whole-of-government collaboration in delivering results. This approach involves collaboration across government, the not-for-profit community housing sector, and mainstream services, all supported by SHS’s within a Housing First framework and guided by a clear governance structure. It marks a shift from a deficit-driven perspective to a solution-focused, positive approach. The success of this transformation relies on collective efforts through co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery, ensuring the long-term effectiveness of the change. For this paradigm shift to succeed, it will require a skilled, committed, and dedicated workforce, as outlined in Principle 8 (The Workforce is Strong and Capable). Recognizing the need for a sustained, locally connected workforce is crucial to addressing the diverse needs of individuals experiencing homelessness across all three phases of their journey. In its feedback on the Strategy, the ahi emphasizes the importance of focused attention on homelessness and social housing workforce planning, professional development, industry support, and the need for culturally competent workers—both paid and voluntary—who bring diversity, inclusion skills, and lived experience. Finally, the ahi urges that Principle 8, which highlights the strength and capability of the workforce, be prioritized, particularly in supporting First Nations people experiencing housing stress and homelessness, with a long-term vision extending beyond the next 10 years. Detailed response The following is more a detailed response from the ahi to the questions outlined in the consultation paper for the Strategy. SECTION 1: The Guiding Principles of the Strategy 1. What do we need to consider as we implement services and system reform guided by these principles (total 9) over the next 10 years? As we implement services and system reform guided by these principles over the next 10 years, the ahi suggests the following approaches be prioritized: Workforce planning should be a key focus in the first rolling action plan (2025-2027), with an emphasis on forecasting the ongoing skills and competency needs throughout the life of The Strategy. This will ensure the workforce is equipped to meet evolving demands. Increasing the supply of dwellings to address crisis, transition, and permanent housing needs must be matched by a parallel increase in the workforce. This includes expanding both paid employees and volunteers within social housing, community housing organizations, and Specialist Homelessness Services (SHS). A well-supported workforce is essential to ensuring the successful and sustainable delivery of outcomes envisioned by the Strategy. Skilling workers who assist First Nations people experiencing homelessness should be prioritised. This requires a culturally competent workforce at all levels to provide high-quality services and ensure that First Nations people do not experience repeated homelessness. By focusing on cultural competence, we can foster better outcomes and long-term stability for these communities. 2. Which Principle should be prioritized and why? The ahi fully supports all nine Principles, with particular emphasis on Principle 8: Workforce is Strong and Capable, as being foundational. Addressing homelessness is a person-centered solution that requires culturally competent employees and volunteers who can establish strong, supportive networks with wraparound services at the local community level. This is essential to meeting the evolving needs and remains a high priority in the First Action Plan (2025-2027). Ongoing professional development for workers is crucial to ensuring long-term success in meeting the changing social, economic, and environmental needs of those living in quality housing. It is also vital for ensuring tenants not only live well but stay connected to their communities. Supporting the workforce’s safety and wellness is key to maintaining a capable, resilient workforce, which in turn ensures the best possible quality of housing, management, and support for tenants. SECTION 2: Strategy focus areas: 1. To make homelessness rare, what should NSW prioritise for action and why? The ahi believes that adequate funding for SHS’s is essential to ensure they are properly resourced to assist individuals at risk of or in a crisis state of homelessness at the point of need. The ability to identify risks and allocate resources effectively for intake assessments and service coordination is key to early intervention and prevention. A triage system is vital for facilitating positive outcomes, aiming to make homelessness a one-off experience. The ahi also supports dedicated funding for staff training and development in this field, recognizing its importance in preventing homelessness from becoming a long-term issue. Investing in training allows for timely and appropriate interventions, helping to break the cycle of homelessness early on. 2. What opportunities and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? Delaying action in assisting individuals experiencing homelessness can lead to a loss of faith and hope in the NSW housing system, pushing them toward the justice system or, in the case of older people or women escaping domestic violence, even premature death. Implementing this outcome presents an opportunity to build a culturally competent, and trauma-informed workforce, a key factor to transforming lives while simultaneously increasing the supply of housing. Supporting a resilient workforce, where high job satisfaction is fostered, creates committed and effective workers who can make a lasting difference. 3. What types (s) would be most useful to measure our impact and why? A key target in the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is to reduce the number of people on the social housing waitlist during the reporting period. This measure will serve as an indicator of success and validate the effectiveness of early intervention policies in preventing homelessness. Additionally, setting targets for the number of employees and volunteers in the social housing and SHS sectors, as well as tracking turnover rates, is essential to assessing the success of building a stronger, more capable workforce. 4. To make homelessness brief, what should NSW Priorities for action & why? Domestic violence, family abuse, and coercive control are major causes of homelessness among women, with the number of homeless women and children increasing according to the latest data. Adequate funding for this vulnerable group is a top priority. Supporting these women has a profound impact on their recovery, resilience, and ability to raise their children, leading to positive generational outcomes in the long term. The rising trend of older women experiencing homelessness for the first time also requires early intervention to prevent premature death. 5. What opportunity and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? The continued trend of women dying as a result of domestic violence and family abuse is deeply concerning. In 2024, 14 older women aged 55 and over were killed, a distressing statistic according to the Commissioner for Domestic and Family Violence, Michaela Cronin. These women are at a higher risk of vulnerability, often with no support systems to rely on. Implementing actions under this outcome presents a crucial opportunity to save lives, reduce the number of women experiencing both domestic violence and homelessness, and help them rebuild their lives. 6. What types of target(s) would be useful for measuring our impact and why? Reducing the number of women who die as a result of domestic violence and family abuse during the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is an important metric to track and report, demonstrating the efficacy of The Strategy. Individual success stories are powerful testimonies that show the goals of the Strategy are benefiting both individuals and the housing system. The skills required for employees and volunteers in this area demand dedicated funding and training resources. Implementing a measure to evaluate the outcomes of training courses would be valuable, helping to refine and improve the content and application of these programs. 7. To ensure homelessness is not repeated, what should NSW prioritize for action and why? First Nations people are overrepresented in experiencing homelessness and face significant challenges in breaking the cycle. Priority should be given to this group under the Housing First Principle, supported by skilled and capable staff and volunteers, to empower them and prevent repeat homelessness. Rental tenancy laws in NSW should be reviewed, particularly regarding the cessation of tenancy due to prolonged absences. Cultural customs related to death and bereavement (Sorry Business) should be recognised as acceptable reasons for absences and incorporated into tenancy policies. 8. What opportunities and risks are there in implementing actions under this outcome? The risk of not achieving the goals outlined in the National Agreement on Closing the Gap for the NSW Government is significant if priority is not given to properly housing and supporting First Nations people. There are valuable opportunities in collaborating with Aboriginal leaders through a co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery approach. Their collective commitment to improving the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people can lead to positive outcomes in housing, health, education, employment, justice, safety, and inclusion. 9. What types of target(s) would be most useful to measure the impact and why? Increase the number of Aboriginal workers with certified qualifications across various areas of the Aboriginal housing sector. Aboriginal tenants depend on highly qualified and culturally competent workers and volunteers to help build their resilience and prevent repeated homelessness. Regular customer satisfaction surveys should be conducted to measure tenants’ satisfaction levels and identify areas of strength and improvement. Conclusion The ahi supports an ambitious supply growth program throughout the life of the Strategy to address homelessness in NSW. With 63,260 households (based on 2023-2024 data) currently on the waiting list, it is crucial to reduce this number over the next 10 years through the rolling action plans. Successfully delivering the Strategy will require a skilled, trauma-informed, and competent workforce to implement an integrated housing system. While workforce planning is mentioned as one of the nine principles, its lack of detailed planning is concerning. The ahi strongly suggests that the principles of co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery be incorporated from the outset in developing the rolling action plans. The ahi thanks the NSW Government for the opportunity to submit feedback and for its ongoing consideration of building a strong and capable workforce that is recognised and supported by a broad range of industries. The value of including people with lived experience and their unique knowledge and skills cannot be overlooked as an essential voice in this transformative process. Contact NSW Branch Committee - Australasian Housing Institute admin@housinginstitute.org www.theahi.com.au (02) 6494 7566 Date submitted: 11/2/25 Submitted to: Homelessness.strategy@homes.nsw.gov.au
More Articles
Share by: