Australasian Housing Institute, AHI

MOVING BEYOND POLITE ADVOCACY: housing activism in Australia

How can we turn activism into results? Mike Collins from Merri-bek City Council provides practical advice from his research into the Bendigo Street Occupation in Melbourne.

Some of the key hopes that many held over the last 50 years have not been realised, such as the deepening of democracy and the intergenerational progress of wellbeing and safety. In response, protest actions that occupy streets, properties and spaces are increasing. 


Grassroots activism has overtaken political and civil advocacy on geopolitical issues such as climate change and modern colonialism. Now housing has become a dominant issue for younger Australians, as a political cause with personal effects.


There is a lot of housing activism happening right now


The current housing crisis is not the first one that Australia has experienced, and neither is activism as the response. The immediate years after World War Two saw many instances of squatting and protest in reaction to the severe shortage of housing. Elsie, the first women’s refuge in Australia, was founded in a squatted council house in Glebe in 1975.


Recently, we have seen campaigns in Sydney and Melbourne with significant involvement of residents against the sell-off or redevelopment of public housing. We have also seen the rise of renter activism with RAHU (Renters and Housing Union) and other volunteer-based groups doing everything from organising information and rights awareness nights for low-income renters to picketing real estate agents.


Notably, there have been social-media-led actions, with the most well-known of these being Jordan Van den Berg, or ‘Purple Pingers.’ In early 2024, Van den Berg started to gain media attention for his encouragement for people to name (and shame) properties that have been left empty. Further to this, there was a suggestion these homes might be occupied by those who were in housing need among his audience. A flurry of media articles and talkback discussion about the legality of squatting and the broader issue of regulation of empty homes followed (see HousingWORKS article on 'meanwhile use' housing). 


As a response to this public discussion, the non-government institutions of housing provision and support, in particular community housing and homelessness organisations, have been largely silent.


A case study of housing activism and the housing sector's response: The Bendigo Street Occupation


This lack of response to housing activism from organisations that advocate housing for all has happened before.

In 2016, housing activists led by the Homeless Persons Union of Victoria (HPUV) took over empty properties that had been compulsorily purchased by the Victorian State Government for the East West Link road and tunnel project. The occupation involved people moving into houses, primarily in Bendigo Street Collingwood, Melbourne, and living in them. 


The initial intention of the occupiers was to draw attention to increased homelessness and the lack of public housing. What started as a political protest action turned into an action, which actually provided housing for people who were homeless. 


The HPUV estimates the occupation housed at least 58 people over eight months. Over time, the occupied houses in Bendigo Street came to look like a microcosm of the unhoused population. Those housed during the occupation included single mothers with children escaping intimate partner violence, and First Nations people, including elders, as well as individuals excluded from safe housing options by poverty and cultural exclusion. 


Bendigo Street was an unusual modern Australian example of housing activism, being larger scale and having a bigger impact on the public conversation than most actions that came before it.

Local government response to the Bendigo Street Occupation


I completed a research project on the Bendigo Street Occupation last year with Kelly Whitworth from the HPUV. We spoke with the Bendigo Street activists, local government staff and councillors to learn about the relationship between policy, government and housing justice.


What emerged was a dramatic story of an action that garnered considerable media attention, included an initially successful legal bid to delay evictions, and a series of public debates and popular celebrations, and a sad end with a small army of police dragging the last occupiers out of the houses.

Our research was focussed on the relationship between the housing activists and local government. We explored how Yarra Council, which had been advocating for the use of the empty Bendigo Street houses as social housing for years before the occupation, quickly shied away from a position of solidarity with the action. This was despite the political and practical aims of the HPUV aligning with the Council’s policy positions. 


Crisis meetings were held with council officers, community housing organisations and police, but the activists were not invited to attend. While there were sympathetic officials from local government and the housing sector who offered practical support, a sense of isolation grew over time. Sensationalist reports were regularly published by popular media outlets and the state government maintained a largely hostile stance towards the activists.


Housing activism can initiate change


We argue in our research that the Bendigo Street Occupation is an example of policy and process change in housing that is unlikely to be achieved through traditional methods and channels of advocacy. 

The Occupation brought high visibility to issues of homelessness and public housing, and many of the previously homeless occupants were housed in public housing elsewhere in Melbourne because of it. Sadly, the occupied houses were eventually sold on the private market by the Victorian Government.


Recommendations for supporting activism


We made a number of recommendations from the research findings, which are focussed on local government but are equally relevant to the housing and community sectors.


One key recommendation is that organisations should develop frameworks to appropriately engage with, and support, grassroots campaigns and actions where policy positions are aligned. As well as this, to help counter opposing narratives from hostile media or politicians, in-house communications and public relations teams could provide support and advice to activists.

Housing as a human right


The definition of the right to housing, included in The United Nations Right to Adequate Housing, is very much within the frame of what housing and social purpose organisations campaign on. It includes affordability, accessibility and security of tenure. To improve alignment with the United Nations definition, housing organisations may wish to focus on whether they are adequately adopting the stated entitlement for people in “participation in housing-related decision-making at the national and community levels.”


The operation of the Australian Charities and Not for Profit Commission (ACNC) under the previous federal government may have had had a chilling effect on the housing sector and other organisations with a social purpose. However, the current ACNC settings only restrict involvement in advocacy and campaigns in a very narrow way: It cannot have the purpose of promoting or opposing a particular political party or candidate.

Charities and not-for-profit organisations are free to engage in activities which are “aimed at securing or opposing any change to a law, policy or practice in the Commonwealth, a state or territory, or another country.” This offers a pretty broad scope for organisations to be able to support housing activism.


Activism is usually outside of normal business hours; it may not always value job titles or organisational branding, and its inherent instability carries many risks. But organisations that work in housing in Australia have an ethical responsibility to take a stand beside and amongst the people.



Download the full research report about the Bendigo Street Occupation.

Images supplied by the Homeless Persons Union of Victoria

Advertisement

Share This Article

Other articles you may like

February 14, 2025
It is with great pleasure that we announce nominations are now open for the ahi: 2025 Brighter Future Awards .
February 14, 2025
About the Australasian Housing Institute The Australasian Housing Institute (ahi) is a professional body for workers in the social and affordable housing and Specialist Homelessness Service (SHS) sectors across Australia and New Zealand. It has Branch Committees in each state and territory, as well as in New Zealand. The ahi is submitting a response to the Draft NSW Homelessness Strategy (the Strategy), representing the collective feedback of the NSW Branch Committee, with the support of the entire ahi organization. With over 2,000 members across NSW, ahi members work in both government and non-government housing organizations. The ahi has a long history of collaborating with SHS, Specialist Disability Services, and other mainstream services, including health, education, and local councils. For the past 25 years, ahi has been proudly delivering training for industry housing professionals across a wide range of areas, including tenancy management, asset management, and governance. The ahi also hosts masterclasses and networking events to support its members. The ahi provides professional development to the workforce through: Training and knowledge-building on a range of issues relevant to social housing professionals, from induction programs for new workers to advanced and specialized training in areas such as asset management, trauma-informed approaches with applicants and tenants, personal development, and community participation. A mentoring program that pairs experienced professionals with newer or younger members to help them achieve their career aspirations and goals. A certification program for social housing professionals to uphold professional standards and ensure success in their area of expertise. Leading the Annual Brighter Future Awards, which recognize excellence in the social housing industry. Promoting active, engaged, and connected membership through the delivery of topical events, seminars, webinars, masterclasses, and more. As a member-based professional body, the ahi is uniquely positioned to build trust, enhance skills, and foster relationships across both the government and non-government sectors, as well as between organizations. Summary The ahi congratulates the NSW Government on its significant investment of $6.6 billion in the 2024 budget, aimed at tackling the unprecedented housing stress and the rising numbers of individuals experiencing homelessness driven by the ongoing rental crisis in both the private rental and social housing sectors. The Strategy for 2025-2035 is highly commendable, with its three core goals—rare, brief, and non-repeated—standing out as ambitious and impactful objectives aimed at addressing homelessness. These goals are set to bring about significant changes in the social housing system and provide a clear policy framework to guide efforts toward achieving meaningful outcomes over the next decade. The ahi recognizes the importance of this Strategy and the critical role that the social and affordable rental housing system plays in meeting these goals, emphasizing the need for genuine, whole-of-government collaboration in delivering results. This approach involves collaboration across government, the not-for-profit community housing sector, and mainstream services, all supported by SHS’s within a Housing First framework and guided by a clear governance structure. It marks a shift from a deficit-driven perspective to a solution-focused, positive approach. The success of this transformation relies on collective efforts through co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery, ensuring the long-term effectiveness of the change. For this paradigm shift to succeed, it will require a skilled, committed, and dedicated workforce, as outlined in Principle 8 (The Workforce is Strong and Capable). Recognizing the need for a sustained, locally connected workforce is crucial to addressing the diverse needs of individuals experiencing homelessness across all three phases of their journey. In its feedback on the Strategy, the ahi emphasizes the importance of focused attention on homelessness and social housing workforce planning, professional development, industry support, and the need for culturally competent workers—both paid and voluntary—who bring diversity, inclusion skills, and lived experience. Finally, the ahi urges that Principle 8, which highlights the strength and capability of the workforce, be prioritized, particularly in supporting First Nations people experiencing housing stress and homelessness, with a long-term vision extending beyond the next 10 years. Detailed response The following is more a detailed response from the ahi to the questions outlined in the consultation paper for the Strategy. SECTION 1: The Guiding Principles of the Strategy 1. What do we need to consider as we implement services and system reform guided by these principles (total 9) over the next 10 years? As we implement services and system reform guided by these principles over the next 10 years, the ahi suggests the following approaches be prioritized: Workforce planning should be a key focus in the first rolling action plan (2025-2027), with an emphasis on forecasting the ongoing skills and competency needs throughout the life of The Strategy. This will ensure the workforce is equipped to meet evolving demands. Increasing the supply of dwellings to address crisis, transition, and permanent housing needs must be matched by a parallel increase in the workforce. This includes expanding both paid employees and volunteers within social housing, community housing organizations, and Specialist Homelessness Services (SHS). A well-supported workforce is essential to ensuring the successful and sustainable delivery of outcomes envisioned by the Strategy. Skilling workers who assist First Nations people experiencing homelessness should be prioritised. This requires a culturally competent workforce at all levels to provide high-quality services and ensure that First Nations people do not experience repeated homelessness. By focusing on cultural competence, we can foster better outcomes and long-term stability for these communities. 2. Which Principle should be prioritized and why? The ahi fully supports all nine Principles, with particular emphasis on Principle 8: Workforce is Strong and Capable, as being foundational. Addressing homelessness is a person-centered solution that requires culturally competent employees and volunteers who can establish strong, supportive networks with wraparound services at the local community level. This is essential to meeting the evolving needs and remains a high priority in the First Action Plan (2025-2027). Ongoing professional development for workers is crucial to ensuring long-term success in meeting the changing social, economic, and environmental needs of those living in quality housing. It is also vital for ensuring tenants not only live well but stay connected to their communities. Supporting the workforce’s safety and wellness is key to maintaining a capable, resilient workforce, which in turn ensures the best possible quality of housing, management, and support for tenants. SECTION 2: Strategy focus areas: 1. To make homelessness rare, what should NSW prioritise for action and why? The ahi believes that adequate funding for SHS’s is essential to ensure they are properly resourced to assist individuals at risk of or in a crisis state of homelessness at the point of need. The ability to identify risks and allocate resources effectively for intake assessments and service coordination is key to early intervention and prevention. A triage system is vital for facilitating positive outcomes, aiming to make homelessness a one-off experience. The ahi also supports dedicated funding for staff training and development in this field, recognizing its importance in preventing homelessness from becoming a long-term issue. Investing in training allows for timely and appropriate interventions, helping to break the cycle of homelessness early on. 2. What opportunities and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? Delaying action in assisting individuals experiencing homelessness can lead to a loss of faith and hope in the NSW housing system, pushing them toward the justice system or, in the case of older people or women escaping domestic violence, even premature death. Implementing this outcome presents an opportunity to build a culturally competent, and trauma-informed workforce, a key factor to transforming lives while simultaneously increasing the supply of housing. Supporting a resilient workforce, where high job satisfaction is fostered, creates committed and effective workers who can make a lasting difference. 3. What types (s) would be most useful to measure our impact and why? A key target in the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is to reduce the number of people on the social housing waitlist during the reporting period. This measure will serve as an indicator of success and validate the effectiveness of early intervention policies in preventing homelessness. Additionally, setting targets for the number of employees and volunteers in the social housing and SHS sectors, as well as tracking turnover rates, is essential to assessing the success of building a stronger, more capable workforce. 4. To make homelessness brief, what should NSW Priorities for action & why? Domestic violence, family abuse, and coercive control are major causes of homelessness among women, with the number of homeless women and children increasing according to the latest data. Adequate funding for this vulnerable group is a top priority. Supporting these women has a profound impact on their recovery, resilience, and ability to raise their children, leading to positive generational outcomes in the long term. The rising trend of older women experiencing homelessness for the first time also requires early intervention to prevent premature death. 5. What opportunity and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? The continued trend of women dying as a result of domestic violence and family abuse is deeply concerning. In 2024, 14 older women aged 55 and over were killed, a distressing statistic according to the Commissioner for Domestic and Family Violence, Michaela Cronin. These women are at a higher risk of vulnerability, often with no support systems to rely on. Implementing actions under this outcome presents a crucial opportunity to save lives, reduce the number of women experiencing both domestic violence and homelessness, and help them rebuild their lives. 6. What types of target(s) would be useful for measuring our impact and why? Reducing the number of women who die as a result of domestic violence and family abuse during the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is an important metric to track and report, demonstrating the efficacy of The Strategy. Individual success stories are powerful testimonies that show the goals of the Strategy are benefiting both individuals and the housing system. The skills required for employees and volunteers in this area demand dedicated funding and training resources. Implementing a measure to evaluate the outcomes of training courses would be valuable, helping to refine and improve the content and application of these programs. 7. To ensure homelessness is not repeated, what should NSW prioritize for action and why? First Nations people are overrepresented in experiencing homelessness and face significant challenges in breaking the cycle. Priority should be given to this group under the Housing First Principle, supported by skilled and capable staff and volunteers, to empower them and prevent repeat homelessness. Rental tenancy laws in NSW should be reviewed, particularly regarding the cessation of tenancy due to prolonged absences. Cultural customs related to death and bereavement (Sorry Business) should be recognised as acceptable reasons for absences and incorporated into tenancy policies. 8. What opportunities and risks are there in implementing actions under this outcome? The risk of not achieving the goals outlined in the National Agreement on Closing the Gap for the NSW Government is significant if priority is not given to properly housing and supporting First Nations people. There are valuable opportunities in collaborating with Aboriginal leaders through a co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery approach. Their collective commitment to improving the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people can lead to positive outcomes in housing, health, education, employment, justice, safety, and inclusion. 9. What types of target(s) would be most useful to measure the impact and why? Increase the number of Aboriginal workers with certified qualifications across various areas of the Aboriginal housing sector. Aboriginal tenants depend on highly qualified and culturally competent workers and volunteers to help build their resilience and prevent repeated homelessness. Regular customer satisfaction surveys should be conducted to measure tenants’ satisfaction levels and identify areas of strength and improvement. Conclusion The ahi supports an ambitious supply growth program throughout the life of the Strategy to address homelessness in NSW. With 63,260 households (based on 2023-2024 data) currently on the waiting list, it is crucial to reduce this number over the next 10 years through the rolling action plans. Successfully delivering the Strategy will require a skilled, trauma-informed, and competent workforce to implement an integrated housing system. While workforce planning is mentioned as one of the nine principles, its lack of detailed planning is concerning. The ahi strongly suggests that the principles of co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery be incorporated from the outset in developing the rolling action plans. The ahi thanks the NSW Government for the opportunity to submit feedback and for its ongoing consideration of building a strong and capable workforce that is recognised and supported by a broad range of industries. The value of including people with lived experience and their unique knowledge and skills cannot be overlooked as an essential voice in this transformative process. Contact NSW Branch Committee - Australasian Housing Institute admin@housinginstitute.org www.theahi.com.au (02) 6494 7566 Date submitted: 11/2/25 Submitted to: Homelessness.strategy@homes.nsw.gov.au
October 24, 2024
Australasian Housing Institute (the Company) wishes to announce that effective from today, 24th October 2024, Accounting & Audit Solutions Bendigo (AASB) has been appointed as auditor of the Company. The change of auditor has occurred due to the resignation of Kelly Partners (Sydney) as the company’s auditor. The company received approval from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to change its auditors in accordance with section 329(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Accordingly, the Company has accepted the resignation of Kelly Partners (Sydney). AASB’s appointment is effective until the next Annual General Meeting of the Company. In accordance with section 327C of the Corporations Act, a resolution will be put to members at the 2025 Annual General Meeting to appoint AASB as the Company’s ongoing auditor.
More Articles
Share by: