Australasian Housing Institute, AHI

CAN YOU KEEP IT DOWN? Handling anti-social behaviour issues in tenancies

Jo Leckie from Big Picture Training filters anti-social behaviour (ASB) through a cross-continental lens and highlights the needs for a harm-centred approach.

Customer satisfaction in the community housing sector is often heavily influenced by the way an organisation manages neighbour disputes and anti-social behaviour (ASB) issues.


In my role as Principal Consultant at Big Picture Training, I’ve assisted several housing organisations in Australia and the UK to impartially review the way they manage service complaints. I’ve found that ASB case-handling impacts satisfaction in a general sense and is often key in determining both whether a customer feels safe in their home and whether their landlord is listening to them.


Triaging and managing ASB reports is a difficult and often frustrating task. Knowing the difference between a neighbour dispute and anti-social behaviour (ASB), having the tools to manage both issues with confidence, can make the difference between service excellence and a service complaint. 

"Not all reports of ASB are ASB; some are neighbour disputes, lifestyle issues and sometimes even family violence."

Not all reports of ASB are ASB; some are neighbour disputes, lifestyle issues and sometimes even family violence. On further investigation, some reports that appear to be minor are something more sinister. ASB and neighbour disputes can also have a devastating impact on the lives of those affected.


I was chatting to Janine Green, the author of Effective ASB Case Management Principles: a guide for social housing providers, last week, and she said, “When managing ASB reports, we should adopt a harm-centred approach. It is particularly important when deciding how serious a case is and what the best course of action should be. No two cases are the same when it comes to ASB reports.


Successfully navigating a report of ASB requires a varied skillset – really strong emotional intelligence; excellent communication skills; curiosity; brilliant end-to-end problem-solving; the ability to build evidence, to investigate a case, to negotiate, and to manage expectations. Officers can’t shy away from having difficult conversations and need to demonstrate empathy, compassion and respect. 


When I moved over to Australia from the UK in 2017 and started working as a general manager for a housing provider in Victoria, I was immediately struck by the differences between the way housing providers in the UK manage ASB reports, often called 'neighbour nuisance complaints'.

As part of their research into ASB (Can effective housing management policies address anti-social behaviour?), AHURI interviewed housing staff from two focus areas in South Australia and Tasmania. All the housing staff interviewed emphasised that an individual, more personal approach to addressing anti-social behaviour worked best. This meant working directly with tenants engaged in anti-social behaviour, assessing the nature of the problem, referring on to appropriate agencies and generally taking an interest in what was happening in the community. 


The housing managers and police interviewed as part of the research stressed the importance of collaboration between their agencies, including informal collaboration and formal contact.


What I found when I started working in Australia was that the opposite was true.  Interagency collaboration is difficult and sometimes non-existent, and staff are caught like rabbits in the headlights, often treating neighbour disputes as ASB, inappropriately enforcing the RTA on victims of family violence, and raising renter’s expectations that action will be taken when in fact there is no tenancy breach and progressing to Tribunal would be a fruitless task.


I was immediately reminded of the Fiona Pilkington case in the UK. Fiona Pilkington lived on a well-maintained housing estate in Barwell in the UK with her family – a son called Anthony and her 18-year-old daughter Frankie who had a mental age of four. 

Sponsor Advertisement

"Over a 10-year period, Fiona [Pilkington] made 33 reports of ASB... There was a failure by the police, local MP and local council to see a connection between all of these crimes and misdemeanors."

Over a 10-year period, Fiona made 33 reports of ASB. In this case, there was a failure by the police, local MP and local council (also the public landlord of the estate) to see a connection between all of these crimes and misdemeanors. They failed to fully appreciate the impact that this victimisation and intimidation was having on Fiona and her family. No action was taken. Each incident was treated as an individual occurrence. 


On 23rd October 2007, two bodies were found in a blazing car on a quiet road. They were Fiona Pilkington and her disabled daughter Frankie. Fiona had been pushed to the point of despair and saw suicide as her only recourse.


The outcome of the inquest and the subsequent investigation carried out by the independent police complaints commission found that the various authorities contributed to the deaths – notably, the failure of officers to connect the dozens of separate calls for assistance. This case changed the law and the way that agencies in the UK, including social housing providers, manage anti-social behaviour complaints. 


In his recent Spotlight on Noise Complaints, the Independent Housing Ombudsman in the UK called on housing providers to take steps to differentiate ASB from other types of nuisance and ensure that not only do their policies reflect the difference but that those managing reports of ASB demonstrate appropriate behaviours and respond professionally.


Big Picture Training are working in partnership with Janine Green ASB & Associates to bring a flagship training program to Australia, designed to 'PAVE' the way for service excellence and provide a toolkit for ASB case management (PAVE is an acronym for the steps required to differentiate ASB from a neighbour dispute or another issue such as family violence).


We hope, by bringing our wealth of experience to the table through this training program and impartial service reviews, we can help housing providers in Australia to upskill and support their teams to successfully navigate what can often be a housing management minefield. 


Ultimately, we want to avoid a situation like the Fiona Pilkington case happening in Australia and New Zealand.

Jo Leckie - Big Picture Training


Jo Leckie

Big Picture Training

Share This Article

Other articles you may like

February 14, 2025
It is with great pleasure that we announce nominations are now open for the ahi: 2025 Brighter Future Awards .
February 14, 2025
About the Australasian Housing Institute The Australasian Housing Institute (ahi) is a professional body for workers in the social and affordable housing and Specialist Homelessness Service (SHS) sectors across Australia and New Zealand. It has Branch Committees in each state and territory, as well as in New Zealand. The ahi is submitting a response to the Draft NSW Homelessness Strategy (the Strategy), representing the collective feedback of the NSW Branch Committee, with the support of the entire ahi organization. With over 2,000 members across NSW, ahi members work in both government and non-government housing organizations. The ahi has a long history of collaborating with SHS, Specialist Disability Services, and other mainstream services, including health, education, and local councils. For the past 25 years, ahi has been proudly delivering training for industry housing professionals across a wide range of areas, including tenancy management, asset management, and governance. The ahi also hosts masterclasses and networking events to support its members. The ahi provides professional development to the workforce through: Training and knowledge-building on a range of issues relevant to social housing professionals, from induction programs for new workers to advanced and specialized training in areas such as asset management, trauma-informed approaches with applicants and tenants, personal development, and community participation. A mentoring program that pairs experienced professionals with newer or younger members to help them achieve their career aspirations and goals. A certification program for social housing professionals to uphold professional standards and ensure success in their area of expertise. Leading the Annual Brighter Future Awards, which recognize excellence in the social housing industry. Promoting active, engaged, and connected membership through the delivery of topical events, seminars, webinars, masterclasses, and more. As a member-based professional body, the ahi is uniquely positioned to build trust, enhance skills, and foster relationships across both the government and non-government sectors, as well as between organizations. Summary The ahi congratulates the NSW Government on its significant investment of $6.6 billion in the 2024 budget, aimed at tackling the unprecedented housing stress and the rising numbers of individuals experiencing homelessness driven by the ongoing rental crisis in both the private rental and social housing sectors. The Strategy for 2025-2035 is highly commendable, with its three core goals—rare, brief, and non-repeated—standing out as ambitious and impactful objectives aimed at addressing homelessness. These goals are set to bring about significant changes in the social housing system and provide a clear policy framework to guide efforts toward achieving meaningful outcomes over the next decade. The ahi recognizes the importance of this Strategy and the critical role that the social and affordable rental housing system plays in meeting these goals, emphasizing the need for genuine, whole-of-government collaboration in delivering results. This approach involves collaboration across government, the not-for-profit community housing sector, and mainstream services, all supported by SHS’s within a Housing First framework and guided by a clear governance structure. It marks a shift from a deficit-driven perspective to a solution-focused, positive approach. The success of this transformation relies on collective efforts through co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery, ensuring the long-term effectiveness of the change. For this paradigm shift to succeed, it will require a skilled, committed, and dedicated workforce, as outlined in Principle 8 (The Workforce is Strong and Capable). Recognizing the need for a sustained, locally connected workforce is crucial to addressing the diverse needs of individuals experiencing homelessness across all three phases of their journey. In its feedback on the Strategy, the ahi emphasizes the importance of focused attention on homelessness and social housing workforce planning, professional development, industry support, and the need for culturally competent workers—both paid and voluntary—who bring diversity, inclusion skills, and lived experience. Finally, the ahi urges that Principle 8, which highlights the strength and capability of the workforce, be prioritized, particularly in supporting First Nations people experiencing housing stress and homelessness, with a long-term vision extending beyond the next 10 years. Detailed response The following is more a detailed response from the ahi to the questions outlined in the consultation paper for the Strategy. SECTION 1: The Guiding Principles of the Strategy 1. What do we need to consider as we implement services and system reform guided by these principles (total 9) over the next 10 years? As we implement services and system reform guided by these principles over the next 10 years, the ahi suggests the following approaches be prioritized: Workforce planning should be a key focus in the first rolling action plan (2025-2027), with an emphasis on forecasting the ongoing skills and competency needs throughout the life of The Strategy. This will ensure the workforce is equipped to meet evolving demands. Increasing the supply of dwellings to address crisis, transition, and permanent housing needs must be matched by a parallel increase in the workforce. This includes expanding both paid employees and volunteers within social housing, community housing organizations, and Specialist Homelessness Services (SHS). A well-supported workforce is essential to ensuring the successful and sustainable delivery of outcomes envisioned by the Strategy. Skilling workers who assist First Nations people experiencing homelessness should be prioritised. This requires a culturally competent workforce at all levels to provide high-quality services and ensure that First Nations people do not experience repeated homelessness. By focusing on cultural competence, we can foster better outcomes and long-term stability for these communities. 2. Which Principle should be prioritized and why? The ahi fully supports all nine Principles, with particular emphasis on Principle 8: Workforce is Strong and Capable, as being foundational. Addressing homelessness is a person-centered solution that requires culturally competent employees and volunteers who can establish strong, supportive networks with wraparound services at the local community level. This is essential to meeting the evolving needs and remains a high priority in the First Action Plan (2025-2027). Ongoing professional development for workers is crucial to ensuring long-term success in meeting the changing social, economic, and environmental needs of those living in quality housing. It is also vital for ensuring tenants not only live well but stay connected to their communities. Supporting the workforce’s safety and wellness is key to maintaining a capable, resilient workforce, which in turn ensures the best possible quality of housing, management, and support for tenants. SECTION 2: Strategy focus areas: 1. To make homelessness rare, what should NSW prioritise for action and why? The ahi believes that adequate funding for SHS’s is essential to ensure they are properly resourced to assist individuals at risk of or in a crisis state of homelessness at the point of need. The ability to identify risks and allocate resources effectively for intake assessments and service coordination is key to early intervention and prevention. A triage system is vital for facilitating positive outcomes, aiming to make homelessness a one-off experience. The ahi also supports dedicated funding for staff training and development in this field, recognizing its importance in preventing homelessness from becoming a long-term issue. Investing in training allows for timely and appropriate interventions, helping to break the cycle of homelessness early on. 2. What opportunities and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? Delaying action in assisting individuals experiencing homelessness can lead to a loss of faith and hope in the NSW housing system, pushing them toward the justice system or, in the case of older people or women escaping domestic violence, even premature death. Implementing this outcome presents an opportunity to build a culturally competent, and trauma-informed workforce, a key factor to transforming lives while simultaneously increasing the supply of housing. Supporting a resilient workforce, where high job satisfaction is fostered, creates committed and effective workers who can make a lasting difference. 3. What types (s) would be most useful to measure our impact and why? A key target in the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is to reduce the number of people on the social housing waitlist during the reporting period. This measure will serve as an indicator of success and validate the effectiveness of early intervention policies in preventing homelessness. Additionally, setting targets for the number of employees and volunteers in the social housing and SHS sectors, as well as tracking turnover rates, is essential to assessing the success of building a stronger, more capable workforce. 4. To make homelessness brief, what should NSW Priorities for action & why? Domestic violence, family abuse, and coercive control are major causes of homelessness among women, with the number of homeless women and children increasing according to the latest data. Adequate funding for this vulnerable group is a top priority. Supporting these women has a profound impact on their recovery, resilience, and ability to raise their children, leading to positive generational outcomes in the long term. The rising trend of older women experiencing homelessness for the first time also requires early intervention to prevent premature death. 5. What opportunity and risks are there for implementing actions under this outcome? The continued trend of women dying as a result of domestic violence and family abuse is deeply concerning. In 2024, 14 older women aged 55 and over were killed, a distressing statistic according to the Commissioner for Domestic and Family Violence, Michaela Cronin. These women are at a higher risk of vulnerability, often with no support systems to rely on. Implementing actions under this outcome presents a crucial opportunity to save lives, reduce the number of women experiencing both domestic violence and homelessness, and help them rebuild their lives. 6. What types of target(s) would be useful for measuring our impact and why? Reducing the number of women who die as a result of domestic violence and family abuse during the First Action Plan (2025-2027) is an important metric to track and report, demonstrating the efficacy of The Strategy. Individual success stories are powerful testimonies that show the goals of the Strategy are benefiting both individuals and the housing system. The skills required for employees and volunteers in this area demand dedicated funding and training resources. Implementing a measure to evaluate the outcomes of training courses would be valuable, helping to refine and improve the content and application of these programs. 7. To ensure homelessness is not repeated, what should NSW prioritize for action and why? First Nations people are overrepresented in experiencing homelessness and face significant challenges in breaking the cycle. Priority should be given to this group under the Housing First Principle, supported by skilled and capable staff and volunteers, to empower them and prevent repeat homelessness. Rental tenancy laws in NSW should be reviewed, particularly regarding the cessation of tenancy due to prolonged absences. Cultural customs related to death and bereavement (Sorry Business) should be recognised as acceptable reasons for absences and incorporated into tenancy policies. 8. What opportunities and risks are there in implementing actions under this outcome? The risk of not achieving the goals outlined in the National Agreement on Closing the Gap for the NSW Government is significant if priority is not given to properly housing and supporting First Nations people. There are valuable opportunities in collaborating with Aboriginal leaders through a co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery approach. Their collective commitment to improving the lives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people can lead to positive outcomes in housing, health, education, employment, justice, safety, and inclusion. 9. What types of target(s) would be most useful to measure the impact and why? Increase the number of Aboriginal workers with certified qualifications across various areas of the Aboriginal housing sector. Aboriginal tenants depend on highly qualified and culturally competent workers and volunteers to help build their resilience and prevent repeated homelessness. Regular customer satisfaction surveys should be conducted to measure tenants’ satisfaction levels and identify areas of strength and improvement. Conclusion The ahi supports an ambitious supply growth program throughout the life of the Strategy to address homelessness in NSW. With 63,260 households (based on 2023-2024 data) currently on the waiting list, it is crucial to reduce this number over the next 10 years through the rolling action plans. Successfully delivering the Strategy will require a skilled, trauma-informed, and competent workforce to implement an integrated housing system. While workforce planning is mentioned as one of the nine principles, its lack of detailed planning is concerning. The ahi strongly suggests that the principles of co-design, co-evaluation, and co-delivery be incorporated from the outset in developing the rolling action plans. The ahi thanks the NSW Government for the opportunity to submit feedback and for its ongoing consideration of building a strong and capable workforce that is recognised and supported by a broad range of industries. The value of including people with lived experience and their unique knowledge and skills cannot be overlooked as an essential voice in this transformative process. Contact NSW Branch Committee - Australasian Housing Institute admin@housinginstitute.org www.theahi.com.au (02) 6494 7566 Date submitted: 11/2/25 Submitted to: Homelessness.strategy@homes.nsw.gov.au
October 24, 2024
Australasian Housing Institute (the Company) wishes to announce that effective from today, 24th October 2024, Accounting & Audit Solutions Bendigo (AASB) has been appointed as auditor of the Company. The change of auditor has occurred due to the resignation of Kelly Partners (Sydney) as the company’s auditor. The company received approval from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to change its auditors in accordance with section 329(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). Accordingly, the Company has accepted the resignation of Kelly Partners (Sydney). AASB’s appointment is effective until the next Annual General Meeting of the Company. In accordance with section 327C of the Corporations Act, a resolution will be put to members at the 2025 Annual General Meeting to appoint AASB as the Company’s ongoing auditor.
More Articles
Share by: